4.6 Review

Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 510-519

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.104

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [HL-54776]
  2. National institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK075030]
  3. USDA Department of Agricultural Research Service [53-K06-5-10, 58-1950-9-001]
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL054776] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK075030, T32DK007651] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite advances in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD), this group of multifactorial disorders remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. CVD is associated with multiple genetic and modifiable risk factors; however, known environmental and genetic influences can only explain a small part of the variability in CVD risk, which is a major obstacle for its prevention and treatment. A more thorough understanding of the factors that contribute to CVD is, therefore, needed to develop more efficacious and cost-effective therapy. Application of the 'omics' technologies will hopefully make these advances a reality. Epigenomics has emerged as one of the most promising areas that will address some of the gaps in our current knowledge of the interaction between nature and nurture in the development of CVD. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA alterations, which collectively enable the cell to respond quickly to environmental changes. A number of CVD risk factors, such as nutrition, smoking, pollution, stress, and the circadian rhythm, have been associated with modification of epigenetic marks. Further examination of these mechanisms may lead to earlier prevention and novel therapy for CVD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available