4.7 Article

Quantitative analysis of ribonucleoside modifications in tRNA by HPLC-coupled mass spectrometry

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 828-841

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES002109, ES015037, ES017010]
  2. MIT Westaway Fund
  3. Merck-MIT Graduate Student Fellowship
  4. David H. Koch Graduate Cancer Research Fellowship
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellowship
  6. Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Post-transcriptional modification of RNA is an important determinant of RNA quality control, translational efficiency, RNA-protein interactions and stress response. This is illustrated by the observation of toxicant-specific changes in the spectrum of tRNA modifications in a stress-response mechanism involving selective translation of codon-biased mRNA for crucial proteins. To facilitate systems-level studies of RNA modifications, we developed a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technique for the quantitative analysis of modified ribonucleosides in tRNA. The protocol includes tRNA purification by HPLC, enzymatic hydrolysis, reversed-phase HPLC resolution of the ribonucleosides, and identification and quantification of individual ribonucleosides by LC-MS via dynamic multiple reaction monitoring (DMRM). In this approach, the relative proportions of modified ribonucleosides are quantified in several micrograms of tRNA in a 15-min LC-MS run. This protocol can be modified to analyze other types of RNA by modifying the steps for RNA purification as appropriate. By comparison, traditional methods for detecting modified ribonucleosides are labor- and time-intensive, they require larger RNA quantities, they are modification-specific or require radioactive labeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available