4.7 Article

Laser-induced choroidal neovascularization model to study age-related macular degeneration in mice

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 2197-2211

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2013.135

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS (F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium)
  2. Foundation against Cancer (foundation of public interest, Belgium)
  3. Fonds speciaux de la Recherche (University of Liege)
  4. Direction Generale Operationnelle de l'Economie, de l'Emploi et de la Recherche from the S.P.W. (Region Wallonne, Belgium)
  5. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme-Belgian Science Policy (Brussels, Belgium)
  6. Plan National Cancer (Service Public Federal)
  7. Actions de Recherche Concertees (University of Liege, Belgium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mouse model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNCNV) has been used extensively in studies of the exudative form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This experimental in vivo model relies on laser injury to perforate Bruch's membrane, resulting in subretinal blood vessel recruitment from the choroid. By recapitulating the main features of the exudative form of human AMD, this assay has served as the backbone for testing antiangiogenic therapies. This standardized protocol can be applied to transgenic mice and can include treatments with drugs, recombinant proteins, antibodies, adenoviruses and pre-microRNAs to aid in the search for new molecular regulators and the identification of novel targets for innovative treatments. This robust assay requires 7-14 d to complete, depending on the treatment applied and whether immunostaining is performed. This protocol includes details of how to induce CNCNV, including laser induction, lesion excision, processing and different approaches to quantify neoformed vasculature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available