4.7 Article

Transcriptome-wide mapping of N6-methyladenosine by m6A-seq based on immunocapturing and massively parallel sequencing

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 176-189

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2012.148

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kahn Family Foundation
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI)
  3. Bio-Med Morasha Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1942/08]
  4. ISF [1667/12]
  5. molecular basis of human disease I-CORE (Israeli Centers of Research Excellence)
  6. Israel Ministry of Science and Technology (Scientific Infrastructure Program)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-6-methyladenosine-sequencing (m(6)A-seq) is an immunocapturing approach for the unbiased transcriptome-wide localization of m(6)A in high resolution. To our knowledge, this is the first protocol to allow a global view of this ubiquitous RNA modification, and it is based on antibody-mediated enrichment of methylated RNA fragments followed by massively parallel sequencing. Building on principles of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), read densities of immunoprecipitated RNA relative to untreated input control are used to identify methylated sites. A consensus motif is deduced, and its distance to the point of maximal enrichment is assessed; these measures further corroborate the success of the protocol. Identified locations are intersected in turn with gene architecture to draw conclusions regarding the distribution of m(6)A between and within gene transcripts. When applied to human and mouse transcriptomes, m(6)A-seq generated comprehensive methylation profiles revealing, for the first time, tenets governing the nonrandom distribution of m(6)A. The protocol can be completed within similar to 9 d for four different sample pairs (each consists of an immunoprecipitation and corresponding input).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available