4.7 Article

Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 111-120

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.178

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHI 871/1-1, 871/2-1]
  2. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
  3. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  4. MSFHR
  5. Swiss National Foundation of Sciences (SNF)
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  7. Canada Research Chair in Metalloproteinase Proteomics and Systems Biology
  8. CIHR
  9. Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA)
  10. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
  11. Cancer Research Society
  12. MSHFR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To link cleaved substrates in complex systems with a specific protease, the protease active site specificity is required. Proteomic identification of cleavage sites (PICS) simultaneously determines both the prime-and non-prime-side specificities of individual proteases through identification of hundreds of individual cleavage sequences from biologically relevant, proteome-derived peptide libraries. PICS also identifies subsite cooperativity. To generate PICS peptide libraries, cellular proteomes are digested with a specific protease such as trypsin. Following protease inactivation, primary amines are protected. After incubation with a test protease, each prime-side cleavage fragment has a free newly formed N-terminus, which is biotinylated for affinity isolation and identification by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The corresponding non-prime sequences are derived bioinformatically. The step-by-step protocol also presents a web service for PICS data analysis, as well as introducing and validating PICS peptide libraries made from Escherichia coli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available