4.7 Article

Cryo-EM of macromolecular assemblies at near-atomic resolution

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 1697-1708

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.126

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health through Nanomedicine Development Center [PN1EY016525]
  2. Nanobiology Training Program [R90DK71504]
  3. Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM079429, R01GM080139]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [P41RR002250]
  5. National Science Foundation [IIS-0705644, IIS-0705474]
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR002250] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [PN1EY016525] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R90DK071504] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM079429, R01GM080139] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With single-particle electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM), it is possible to visualize large, macromolecular assemblies in near-native states. Although subnanometer resolutions have been routinely achieved for many specimens, state of the art cryo-EM has pushed to near-atomic (3.3-4.6 angstrom) resolutions. At these resolutions, it is now possible to construct reliable atomic models directly from the cryo-EM density map. In this study, we describe our recently developed protocols for performing the three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of Mm-cpn, a group II chaperonin, determined to 4.3 angstrom resolution. This protocol, utilizing the software tools EMAN, Gorgon and Coot, can be adapted for use with nearly all specimens imaged with cryo-EM that target beyond 5 angstrom resolution. Additionally, the feature recognition and computational modeling tools can be applied to any near-atomic resolution density maps, including those from X-ray crystallography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available