4.7 Article

Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-beta gal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 1798-1806

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.191

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [LSHM-CT-2005-518230]
  2. GeHA [LSHM-CT-2004-503270, LSHM-CT-2005-513866, HEALTH-F4-2008-200970]
  3. Marie Curie Matiss Project [MTKI-CT-2006042768]
  4. US National Institutes of Health [AG09909, AG017242, CA0126540, AG032117, AG025708]
  5. British Heart Foundation
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA126540] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R37AG009909, R01AG009909, R56AG009909, P30AG025708, P01AG017242] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normal cells can permanently lose the ability to proliferate when challenged by potentially oncogenic stress, a process termed cellular senescence. Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SASA-beta gal) activity, detectable at pH 6.0, permits the identification of senescent cells in culture and mammalian tissues. Here we describe first a cytochemical protocol suitable for the histochemical detection of individual senescent cells both in culture and tissue biopsies. The second method is based on the alkalinization of lysosomes, followed by the use of 5-dodecanoylaminofluorescein di-beta-D-galactopyranoside (C(12)FDG), a fluorogenic substrate for beta gal activity. The cytochemical method takes about 30 min to execute, and several hours to a day to develop and score. The fluorescence methods take between 4 and 8 h to execute and can be scored in a single day. The cytochemical method is applicable to tissue sections and requires simple reagents and equipment. The fluorescence-based methods have the advantages of being more quantitative and sensitive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available