4.8 Article

Charge-cluster glass in an organic conductor

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages 419-422

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nphys2642

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Photon Factory Program Advisory Committee [2012G115]
  2. Funding Program of World Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST program)
  3. Council for Science and Technology Policy, Japan
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [24684020, 24224009, 20110002, 24654101]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20110002, 20110001, 24684020, 24654101, 21224008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geometrically frustrated spin systems often do not exhibit long-range magnetic ordering, resulting in either quantum-mechanically disordered states, such as quantum spin liquids(1), or classically disordered states, such as spin ices(2,3) or spin glasses'. Geometric frustration may play a similar role in charge ordering(5,6), potentially leading to unconventional electronic states without long-range order; however, there are no previous experimental demonstrations of this phenomenon. Here, we show that a charge-cluster glass evolves on cooling in the absence of long-range charge ordering for an organic conductor with a triangular lattice. A combination of time-resolved transport measurements and X-ray diffraction reveals that the charge-liquid phase has two-dimensional charge clusters that fluctuate extremely slowly (<10-100 Hz) and heterogeneously. On further cooling, the cluster dynamics freezes, and a charge-cluster glass is formed. Surprisingly, these observations correspond to recent ideas regarding the structural glass formation of supercooled liquids(7-10). Glassy behaviour has often been found in transition-metal oxides, but only under the influence of randomly located dopantem(11,12). As organic conductors are very clean systems, the present glassy behaviour is probably conceptually different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available