4.8 Article

Equal-spin Andreev reflection and long-range coherent transport in high-temperature superconductor/half-metallic ferromagnet junctions

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 539-543

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nphys2318

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French ANR grant 'SUPERHYBRIDS-II'
  2. RTRA grant 'Supraspin'
  3. European Community's FP7 'Pixie'
  4. Spanish MICINN [MAT 2011 27470, CSD2009-00013, CAM S2009-MAT 1756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional superconductivity is incompatible with ferromagnetism, because the magnetic exchange field tends to spin-polarize electrons and breaks apart the opposite-spin singlet Cooper pairs(1). Yet, the possibility of a long-range penetration of superconducting correlations into strong ferromagnets has been evinced by experiments that found Josephson coupling between superconducting electrodes separated afar by a ferromagnetic spacer(2-7). This is considered a proof of the emergence at the superconductor/ferromagnetic (S/F) interfaces of equal-spin triplet pairing, which is immune to the exchange field and can therefore propagate over long distances into the F (ref. 8). This effect bears much fundamental interest and potential for spintronic applications(9). However, a spectroscopic signature of the underlying microscopic mechanisms has remained elusive. Here we do show this type of evidence, notably in a S/F system for which the possible appearance of equal-spin triplet pairing is controversial(10-12): heterostructures that combine a half-metallic F (La0.7Ca0.3MnO3) with a d-wave S (YBa2Cu3O7). We found quasiparticle and electron interference effects in the conductance across the S/F interfaces that directly demonstrate the long-range propagation across La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 of superconducting correlations, and imply the occurrence of unconventional equal-spin Andreev reflection. This allows for an understanding of the unusual proximity behaviour observed in this type of heterostructures(12,13).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available