4.8 Article

Bias-voltage dependence of perpendicular spin-transfer torque in asymmetric MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 898-902

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS1427

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) through the National Research Laboratory program [M10600000198-06J0000-19810]
  2. Korean Ministry of Science and Technology [R01-2007-000-20281-0]
  3. Korea Institute of Science and Technology [KSC-2008-S01-0012]
  4. KBSI [T29513]
  5. NSF [DMR-0704182]
  6. University of Alabama through Adjunct Professorship
  7. Nanosciences Foundation (RTRA) in Grenoble, France
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2007-000-20281-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spin-transfer torque(1,2) (STT) allows the electrical control of magnetic states in nanostructures(3-5). The STT in magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) is of particular importance owing to its potential for device applications(6,7). It has been demonstrated(8-11) that the MTJ has a sizable perpendicular STT (tau(perpendicular to), field-like torque), which substantially affects STT-driven magnetization dynamics. In contrast to symmetric MTJs where the bias dependence of tau(perpendicular to) is quadratic(8-10,12,13), it is theoretically predicted that the symmetry breaking of the system causes an extra linear bias dependence(11). Here, we report experimental results that are consistent with the predicted linear bias dependence in asymmetric MTJs. The linear contribution is quite significant and its sign changes from positive to negative as the asymmetry is modified. This result opens a way to design the bias dependence of the field-like term, which is useful for device applications by allowing, in particular, the suppression of the abnormal switching-back phenomena.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available