4.8 Article

On the experimental verification of quantum complexity in linear optics

Journal

NATURE PHOTONICS
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 621-626

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2014.152

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. European Research Council (ERC)
  3. Centre for Nanoscience and Quantum Information (NSQI)
  4. US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  5. US Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
  6. Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship
  7. Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award
  8. Royal Academy of Engineering Chair in Emerging Technologies
  9. EPSRC [EP/K023063/1, EP/K021931/1, EP/J00815X/1, EP/K033085/1, EP/L024020/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K021931/1, EP/J00815X/1, EP/K023063/1, EP/L024020/1, EP/K033085/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum computers promise to solve certain problems that are forever intractable to classical computers. The first of these devices are likely to tackle bespoke problems suited to their own particular physical capabilities. Sampling the probability distribution from many bosons interfering quantum-mechanically is conjectured to be intractable to a classical computer but solvable with photons in linear optics. However, the complexity of this type of problem means its solution is mathematically unverifiable, so the task of establishing successful operation becomes one of gathering sufficiently convincing circumstantial or experimental evidence. Here, we develop scalable methods to experimentally establish correct operation for this class of computation, which we implement for three, four and five photons in integrated optical circuits, on Hilbert spaces of up to 50,000 dimensions. Our broad approach is practical for all quantum computational architectures where formal verification methods for quantum algorithms are either intractable or unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available