4.8 Article

Self-terminating diffraction gates femtosecond X-ray nanocrystallography measurements

Journal

NATURE PHOTONICS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 35-40

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2011.297

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. DOE through the PULSE Institute at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. US National Science Foundation [0417142, MCB 1021557]
  6. US National Institutes of Health [1R01GM095583-01, 1U54GM094625-01]
  7. Joachim Herz Stiftung and the Swedish Research Council
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1120997, 0417142] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-ray free-electron lasers have enabled new approaches to the structural determination of protein crystals that are too small or radiation-sensitive for conventional analysis(1). For sufficiently short pulses, diffraction is collected before significant changes occur to the sample, and it has been predicted that pulses as short as 10 fs may be required to acquire atomic-resolution structural information(1-4). Here, we describe a mechanism unique to ultrafast, ultra-intense X-ray experiments that allows structural information to be collected from crystalline samples using high radiation doses without the requirement for the pulse to terminate before the onset of sample damage. Instead, the diffracted X-rays are gated by a rapid loss of crystalline periodicity, producing apparent pulse lengths significantly shorter than the duration of the incident pulse. The shortest apparent pulse lengths occur at the highest resolution, and our measurements indicate that current X-ray free-electron laser technology(5) should enable structural determination from submicrometre protein crystals with atomic resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available