4.7 Article

Selective conversion of fibroblasts into peripheral sensory neurons

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 25-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3887

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA031566]
  2. National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders [DC012592]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [MH102698]
  4. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [RB3-02186]
  5. Baxter Family Foundation
  6. Norris Foundation
  7. Del Webb Foundation
  8. Las Patronas
  9. Dorris Neuroscience Center
  10. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine
  11. NSF Predoctoral Fellowship
  12. Andrea Elizabeth Vogt Memorial Award
  13. Scripps Stem Cell Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans and mice detect pain, itch, temperature, pressure, stretch and limb position via signaling from peripheral sensory neurons. These neurons are divided into three functional classes (nociceptors/pruritoceptors, mechanoreceptors and proprioceptors) that are distinguished by their selective expression of TrkA, TrkB or TrkC receptors, respectively. We found that transiently coexpressing Brn3a with either Ngn1 or Ngn2 selectively reprogrammed human and mouse fibroblasts to acquire key properties of these three classes of sensory neurons. These induced sensory neurons (iSNs) were electrically active, exhibited distinct sensory neuron morphologies and matched the characteristic gene expression patterns of endogenous sensory neurons, including selective expression of Trk receptors. In addition, we found that calcium-imaging assays could identify subsets of iSNs that selectively responded to diverse ligands known to activate itch-and pain-sensing neurons. These results offer a simple and rapid means for producing genetically diverse human sensory neurons suitable for drug screening and mechanistic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available