4.7 Article

Release probability of hippocampal glutamatergic terminals scales with the size of the active zone

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 988-997

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3137

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. Wellcome Trust [083484/Z/07/Z, 090197/Z/09/Z, 094513/Z/10/Z]
  3. European Research Council
  4. Hungarian National Office for Research and Technology-French National Research Agency TeT Fund (NKTH-Neurogen)
  5. GOP [1.1.1-08/1-2008-0085]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 780]
  7. Wellcome Trust [094513/Z/10/Z, 090197/Z/09/Z, 083484/Z/07/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cortical synapses have structural, molecular and functional heterogeneity; our knowledge regarding the relationship between their ultrastructural and functional parameters is still fragmented. Here we asked how the neurotransmitter release probability and presynaptic [Ca2+] transients relate to the ultrastructure of rat hippocampal glutamatergic axon terminals. Two-photon Ca2+ imaging derived optical quantal analysis and correlated electron microscopic reconstructions revealed a tight correlation between the release probability and the active-zone area. Peak amplitude of [Ca2+] transients in single boutons also positively correlated with the active-zone area. Freeze-fracture immunogold labeling revealed that the voltage-gated calcium channel subunit Cav2.1 and the presynaptic protein Rim 1/2 are confined to the active zone and their numbers scale linearly with the active-zone area. Gold particles labeling Cav2.1 were nonrandomly distributed in the active zones. Our results demonstrate that the numbers of several active-zone proteins, including presynaptic calcium channels, as well as the number of docked vesicles and the release probability, scale linearly with the active-zone area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available