4.7 Article

BCL6 controls neurogenesis through Sirt1-dependent epigenetic repression of selective Notch targets

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 1627-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3264

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian Queen Elizabeth Medical Foundation
  2. Fondation Pierre Clerdent
  3. Fondation Roger de Spoelberch
  4. Action de Recherches Concertees Programs
  5. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program, Belgian State, Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs
  6. Belgian FNRS
  7. Fonds pour la Recherche Scientifique Medicale
  8. Welbio and Programme d'Excellence CIBLES of the Walloon Region
  9. EMBO Long-Term Fellowship
  10. Marie Curie Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During neurogenesis, neural stem/progenitor cells (NPCs) undergo an irreversible fate transition to become neurons. The Notch pathway is important for this process, and repression of Notch-dependent Hes genes is essential for triggering differentiation. However, Notch signaling often remains active throughout neuronal differentiation, implying a change in the transcriptional responsiveness to Notch during the neurogenic transition. We identified Bcl6, an oncogene, as encoding a proneurogenic factor that is required for proper neurogenesis of the mouse cerebral cortex. BCL6 promoted the neurogenic conversion by switching the composition of Notch-dependent transcriptional complexes at the Hes5 promoter. BCL6 triggered exclusion of the co-activator Mastermind-like 1 and recruitment of the NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase Sirt1, which was required for BCL6-dependent neurogenesis. The resulting epigenetic silencing of Hes5 led to neuronal differentiation despite active Notch signaling. Our findings suggest a role for BCL6 in neurogenesis and uncover Notch-BCL6-Sirt1 interactions that may affect other aspects of physiology and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available