4.8 Article

Bi- and trilayer graphene solutions

Journal

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 439-445

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2011.94

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Office of Naval Research Multi University Research Initiative (MURI) on Graphene Advanced Terahertz Engineering (GATE) at MIT
  2. Harvard and Boston University
  3. US Office of Naval Research
  4. DuPont/MIT Alliance
  5. David H. Koch Fellowship
  6. Army Research Office
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1133813] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bilayer and trilayer graphene with controlled stacking is emerging as one of the most promising candidates for post-silicon nanoelectronics. However, it is not yet possible to produce large quantities of bilayer or trilayer graphene with controlled stacking, as is required for many applications. Here, we demonstrate a solution-phase technique for the production of large-area, bilayer or trilayer graphene from graphite, with controlled stacking. The ionic compounds iodine chloride (ICl) or iodine bromide (IBr) intercalate the graphite starting material at every second or third layer, creating second-or third-stage controlled graphite intercolation compounds, respectively. The resulting solution dispersions are specifically enriched with bilayer or trilayer graphene, respectively. Because the process requires only mild sonication, it produces graphene flakes with areas as large as 50 mu m(2). Moreover, the electronic properties of the flakes are superior to those achieved with other solution-based methods; for example, unannealed samples have resistivities as low as similar to 1 k Omega and hole mobilities as high as similar to 400 cm(2) V(-1) s(-1). The solution-based process is expected to allow high-throughput production, functionalization, and the transfer of samples to arbitrary substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available