4.8 Article

Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 1185-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NMETH.2722

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  2. US National Institutes of Health/NHGRI [U54HG004555, U54HG004557]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT09805]
  4. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [BIO2011-26205, CSD2007-00050]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Emerging Frontiers [0850237] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1054631] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1054631] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-throughput RNA sequencing is an increasingly accessible method for studying gene structure and activity on a genome-wide scale. A critical step in RNA-seq data analysis is the alignment of partial transcript reads to a reference genome sequence. To assess the performance of current mapping software, we invited developers of RNA-seq aligners to process four large human and mouse RNA-seq data sets. In total, we compared 26 mapping protocols based on 11 programs and pipelines and found major performance differences between methods on numerous benchmarks, including alignment yield, basewise accuracy, mismatch and gap placement, exon junction discovery and suitability of alignments for transcript reconstruction. We observed concordant results on real and simulated RNA-seq data, confirming the relevance of the metrics employed. Future developments in RNA-seq alignment methods would benefit from improved placement of multimapped reads, balanced utilization of existing gene annotation and a reduced false discovery rate for splice junctions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available