4.8 Article

The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 1063-1067

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2697

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two surveys of over 1,700 publications whose authors use quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reveal a lack of transparent and comprehensive reporting of essential technical information. Reporting standards are significantly improved in publications that cite the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, although such publications are still vastly outnumbered by those that do not.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available