4.8 Article

The exerkine apelin reverses age-associated sarcopenia

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1360-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0131-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. INSEAM (Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale)
  2. Region Occitanie
  3. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  4. European funds (Fonds Europeens de Developpement Regional, FEDER), Toulouse Metropole
  5. French Ministry of Research through the Investissement d'Avenir Infrastructures Nationales en Biologie et Sante program (ProFI, Proteomics French Infrastructure project) [ANR-10-INBS-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcopenia, the degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass, quality and strength, lacks early diagnostic tools and new therapeutic strategies to prevent the frailty-to-disability transition often responsible for the medical institutionalization of elderly individuals. Herein we report that production of the endogenous peptide apelin, induced by muscle contraction, is reduced in an age-dependent manner in humans and rodents and is positively associated with the beneficial effects of exercise in older persons. Mice deficient in either apelin or its receptor (APLNR) presented dramatic alterations in muscle function with increasing age. Various strategies that restored apelin signaling during aging further demonstrated that this peptide considerably enhanced muscle function by triggering mitochondriogenesis, autophagy and anti-inflammatory pathways in myofibers as well as enhancing the regenerative capacity by targeting muscle stem cells. Taken together, these findings revealed positive regulatory feedback between physical activity, apelin and muscle function and identified apelin both as a tool for diagnosis of early sarcopenia and as the target of an innovative pharmacological strategy to prevent age-associated muscle weakness and restore physical autonomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available