4.8 Article

Direct regulation of blood pressure by smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptors

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 1429-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2891

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [HL095590, HL092241, T32 HL069770]
  2. American Heart Association [11GRNT7240000, 11POST7590096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor present in over two-thirds of people over age 60 in North America; elevated blood pressure correlates with increased risk of heart attack, stroke and progression to heart and kidney failure. Current therapies are insufficient to control blood pressure in almost half of these patients(1,2). The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), acting in the kidney, is known to regulate blood pressure through aldosterone binding and stimulation of sodium retention(3). However, recent studies support the concept that the MR also has extrarenal actions(4-7) and that defects in sodium handling alone do not fully explain the development of hypertension and associated cardiovascular mortality(8,9). We and others have identified functional MR in human vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs)(10,11), suggesting that vascular MR might directly regulate blood pressure. Here we show that mice with SMC-specific deficiency of the MR have decreased blood pressure as they age without defects in renal sodium handling or vascular structure. Aged mice lacking MR in SMCs (SMC-MR) have reduced vascular myogenic tone, agonist-dependent contraction and expression and activity of L-type calcium channels. Moreover, SMC-MR contributes to angiotensin II-induced vascular oxidative stress, vascular contraction and hypertension. This study identifies a new role for vascular MR in blood pressure control and in vascular aging and supports the emerging hypothesis that vascular tone contributes directly to systemic blood pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available