4.8 Article

Editing T cell specificity towards leukemia by zinc finger nucleases and lentiviral gene transfer

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 807-U212

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2700

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR07-5 BO, RO10/07-B-1]
  2. Italian Ministry of Research and University (FIRB-IDEAS)
  3. Fondazione Cariplo
  4. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)
  5. EU (ERC) [GA 222878, 249845]
  6. AIRC
  7. Italian Telethon [TELE11/12-D2]
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [249845] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transfer of high-avidity T cell receptor (TCR) genes isolated from rare tumor-specific lymphocytes into polyclonal T cells is an attractive cancer immunotherapy strategy. However, TCR gene transfer results in competition for surface expression and inappropriate pairing between the exogenous and endogenous TCR chains, resulting in suboptimal activity and potentially harmful unpredicted antigen specificities of the resultant TCRs. We designed zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) that promoted the disruption of endogenous TCR beta- and alpha-chain genes. Lymphocytes treated with ZFNs lacked surface expression of CD3-TCR and expanded with the addition of interleukin-7 (IL-7) and IL-15. After lentiviral transfer of a TCR specific for the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) antigen, these TCR-edited cells expressed the new TCR at high levels, were easily expanded to near purity and were superior at specific antigen recognition compared to donor-matched, unedited TCR-transferred cells. In contrast to unedited TCR-transferred cells, the TCR-edited lymphocytes did not mediate off-target reactivity while maintaining their anti-tumor activity in vivo, thus showing that complete editing of T cell specificity generates tumor-specific lymphocytes with improved biosafety profiles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available