4.8 Article

Oncogenic NRAS signaling differentially regulates survival and proliferation in melanoma

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages 1503-U96

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2941

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [117842-PF-09-261-01-TBG]
  2. US National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award Program
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. US National Institutes of Health [U01 CA141508]
  5. Abby S. and Howard P. Milstein Innovation Award for Melanoma and Skin Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of potent inhibitors of the BRAF proto-oncogene has revolutionized therapy for melanoma harboring mutations in BRAF, yet NRAS-mutant melanoma remains without an effective therapy. Because direct pharmacological inhibition of the RAS proto-oncogene has thus far been unsuccessful, we explored systems biology approaches to identify synergistic drug combination(s) that can mimic RAS inhibition. Here, leveraging an inducible mouse model of NRAS-mutant melanoma, we show that pharmacological inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) activates apoptosis but not cell-cycle arrest, which is in contrast to complete genetic neuroblastoma RAS homolog (NRAS) extinction, which triggers both of these effects. Network modeling pinpointed cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) as a key driver of this differential phenotype. Accordingly, combined pharmacological inhibition of MEK and CDK4 in vivo led to substantial synergy in therapeutic efficacy. We suggest a gradient model of oncogenic NRAS signaling in which the output is gated, resulting in the decoupling of discrete downstream biological phenotypes as a result of incomplete inhibition. Such a gated signaling model offers a new framework to identify nonobvious coextinction target(s) for combined pharmacological inhibition in NRAS-mutant melanomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available