4.8 Article

Mosaic vaccines elicit CD8+ T lymphocyte responses that confer enhanced immune coverage of diverse HIV strains in monkeys

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 324-U122

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.2108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [AI-0678501]
  2. HIV Research and Design (HIVRAD) [P01 AI-61734]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [N01 AI-50010]
  4. Los Alamos National Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An effective HIV vaccine must elicit immune responses that recognize genetically diverse viruses(1,2). It must generate CD8(+) T lymphocytes that control HIV replication and CD4(+) T lymphocytes that provide help for the generation and maintenance of both cellular and humoral immune responses against the virus(3-5). Creating immunogens that can elicit cellular immune responses against the genetically varied circulating isolates of HIV presents a key challenge for creating an HIV vaccine(6,7). Polyvalent mosaic immunogens derived by in silico recombination of natural strains of HIV are designed to induce cellular immune responses that recognize genetically diverse circulating virus isolates(8). Here we immunized rhesus monkeys by plasmid DNA prime and recombinant vaccinia virus boost with vaccine constructs expressing either consensus or polyvalent mosaic proteins. As compared to consensus immunogens, the mosaic immunogens elicited CD8(+) T lymphocyte responses to more epitopes of each viral protein than did the consensus immunogens and to more variant sequences of CD8(+) T lymphocyte epitopes. This increased breadth and depth of epitope recognition may contribute both to protection against infection by genetically diverse viruses and to the control of variant viruses that emerge as they mutate away from recognition by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available