4.8 Article

Notch signaling maintains bone marrow mesenchymal progenitors by suppressing osteoblast differentiation

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 306-314

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm1716

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR046852, 5T32AR07033, AR046523, T32 AR007033, R01 AR046523, R37 AR046523, R01 AR046852] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD044056, R01 HD044056, R01 HD044056-05] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK065789, R01 DK065789-05, DK065789, DK11794] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Postnatal bone marrow houses mesenchymal progenitor cells that are osteoblast precursors. These cells have established therapeutic potential, but they are difficult to maintain and expand in vitro, presumably because little is known about the mechanisms controlling their fate decisions. To investigate the potential role of Notch signaling in osteoblastogenesis, we used conditional alleles to genetically remove components of the Notch signaling system during skeletal development. We found that disruption of Notch signaling in the limb skeletogenic mesenchyme markedly increased trabecular bone mass in adolescent mice. Notably, mesenchymal progenitors were undetectable in the bone marrow of mice with high bone mass. As a result, these mice developed severe osteopenia as they aged. Moreover, Notch signaling seemed to inhibit osteoblast differentiation through Hes or Hey proteins, which diminished Runx2 transcriptional activity via physical interaction. These results support a model wherein Notch signaling in bone marrow normally acts to maintain a pool of mesenchymal progenitors by suppressing osteoblast differentiation. Thus, mesenchymal progenitors may be expanded in vitro by activating the Notch pathway, whereas bone formation in vivo may be enhanced by transiently suppressing this pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available