4.8 Article

Reversal of learning deficits in a Tsc2+/- mouse model of tuberous sclerosis

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 843-848

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm1788

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS038480, P01 NS024279-160011, P01 NS024279, R01 NS038480-08, R01-NS38480, NS24279, R01 NS038480-06] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Autism Speaks [AS1862] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberous sclerosis is a single-gene disorder caused by heterozygous mutations in the TSC1 (9q34) or TSC2 (16p13.3) gene(1,2) and is frequently associated with mental retardation, autism and epilepsy. Even individuals with tuberous sclerosis and a normal intelligence quotient (approximately 50%)(3-5) are commonly affected with specific neuropsychological problems, including long-term and working memory deficits(6,7). Here we report that mice with a heterozygous, inactivating mutation in the Tsc2 gene (Tsc2(+/-) mice)(8) show deficits in learning and memory. Cognitive deficits in Tsc2(+/-) mice emerged in the absence of neuropathology and seizures, demonstrating that other disease mechanisms are involved(5,9-11). We show that hyperactive hippocampal mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling led to abnormal long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of the hippocampus and consequently to deficits in hippocampal-dependent learning. These deficits included impairments in two spatial learning tasks and in contextual discrimination. Notably, we show that a brief treatment with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin in adult mice rescues not only the synaptic plasticity, but also the behavioral deficits in this animal model of tuberous sclerosis. The results presented here reveal a biological basis for some of the cognitive deficits associated with tuberous sclerosis, and they show that treatment with mTOR antagonists ameliorates cognitive dysfunction in a mouse model of this disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available