4.8 Article

Uncovering the intrinsic size dependence of hydriding phase transformations in nanocrystals

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 905-912

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3716

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. US Department of Energy Hydrogen Storage Program [KC0202020]
  3. Mohr Davidow Ventures and Berkeley Sensor and Actuators Center
  4. Center for Nanoscale Control of Geologic CO2
  5. US D.O.E. Energy Frontier Research Center [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative understanding of nanocrystal phase transformations would enable more efficient energy conversion and catalysis, but has been hindered by difficulties in directly monitoring well-characterized nanoscale systems in reactive environments. We present a new in situ luminescence-based probe enabling direct quantification of nanocrystal phase transformations, applied here to the hydriding transformation of palladium nanocrystals. Our approach reveals the intrinsic kinetics and thermodynamics of nanocrystal phase transformations, eliminating complications of substrate strain, ligand effects and external signal transducers. Clear size-dependent trends emerge in nanocrystals long accepted to be bulk-like in behaviour. Statistical mechanical simulations show these trends to be a consequence of nanoconfinement of a thermally driven, first-order phase transition: near the phase boundary, critical nuclei of the new phase are comparable in size to the nanocrystal itself. Transformation rates are then unavoidably governed by nanocrystal dimensions. Our results provide a general framework for understanding how nanoconfinement fundamentally impacts broad classes of thermally driven solid-state phase transformations relevant to hydrogen storage, catalysis, batteries and fuel cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available