4.8 Article

Onsager's Wien effect on a lattice

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 1033-1037

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3729

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institut Universitaire de France
  2. EPSRC [EP/I034599/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I034599/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/I034599/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The second Wien effect describes the nonlinear, non-equilibrium response of a weak electrolyte in moderate to high electric fields. Onsager's 1934 electrodiffusion theory(1), along with various extensions(2-4), has been invoked for systems and phenomena as diverse as solar cells(5,6), surfactant solutions(7), water splitting reactions(8,9), dielectric liquids(10), electrohydrodynamic flow(11), water and ice physics(12), electrical double layers(13), non-ohmic conduction in semiconductors(14) and oxide glasses(15), biochemical nerve response(16) and magnetic monopoles in spin ice(17). In view of this technological importance and the experimental ubiquity of such phenomena, it is surprising that Onsager's Wien effect has never been studied by numerical simulation. Here we present simulations of a lattice Coulomb gas, treating the widely applicable case of a double equilibrium for free charge generation. We obtain detailed characterization of the Wien effect and confirm the accuracy of the analytical theories as regards the field evolution of the free charge density and correlations. We also demonstrate that simulations can uncover further corrections, such as how the field-dependent conductivity may be influenced by details of microscopic dynamics. We conclude that lattice simulation offers a powerful means by which to model and investigate system-specific corrections to the Onsager theory, and thus constitutes a valuable tool for detailed theoretical studies of the numerous practical applications of the second Wien effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available