4.8 Review

Nuclear spin effects in semiconductor quantum dots

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 494-504

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3652

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/G001642/1, EP/J007544/1]
  2. ITN Spin-Optronics
  3. Royal Society
  4. IARPA
  5. European Research Council
  6. Dutch Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
  7. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), through the Army Research Office [W911NF-12-1-0354]
  8. Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation
  9. Center for Probing the Nanoscale, an NSF NSEC [PHY-0830228]
  10. NSF [DMR-0803974]
  11. EPSRC [EP/J007544/1, EP/G001642/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G001642/1, EP/J007544/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  14. Division Of Materials Research [0803974] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction of an electronic spin with its nuclear environment, an issue known as the central spin problem, has been the subject of considerable attention due to its relevance for spin-based quantum computation using semiconductor quantum dots. Independent control of the nuclear spin bath using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques and dynamic nuclear polarization using the central spin itself offer unique possibilities for manipulating the nuclear bath with significant consequences for the coherence and controlled manipulation of the central spin. Here we review some of the recent optical and transport experiments that have explored this central spin problem using semiconductor quantum dots. We focus on the interaction between 104-106 nuclear spins and a spin of a single electron or valence-band hole. We also review the experimental techniques as well as the key theoretical ideas and the implications for quantum information science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available