4.8 Article

Coexistence of static magnetism and superconductivity in SmFeAsO1-xFx as revealed by muon spin rotation

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 310-314

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmat2396

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Schweizer Nationalfonds (SNF) [200020-119784]
  2. NCCR
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BE2684/1-3]
  4. UK EPSRC
  5. EPSRC [EP/G003092/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G003092/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent observation of superconductivity with critical temperatures (T-c) up to 55 K in the pnictide RFeAsO1-xFx, where R is a lanthanide, marks the first discovery of a non-copper-oxide-based layered high-T-c superconductor(1-3). It has raised the suspicion that these new materials share a similar pairing mechanism to the cuprate superconductors, as both families exhibit superconductivity following charge doping of a magnetic parent material. In this context, it is important to follow the evolution of the microscopic magnetic properties of the pnictides with doping and hence to determine whether magnetic correlations coexist with superconductivity. Here, we present a muon spin rotation study on SmFeAsO1-xFx, with x = 0 - 0 : 30 that shows that, as in the cuprates, static magnetism persists well into the superconducting regime. This analogy is quite surprising as the parent compounds of the two families have rather different magnetic ground states: itinerant spin density wave for the pnictides contrasted with the Mott Hubbard insulator in the cuprates. Our findings therefore suggest that the proximity to magnetic order and associated soft magnetic fluctuations, rather than strong electronic correlations in the vicinity of a Mott-Hubbard transition, may be the key ingredients of high-T-c superconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available