4.8 Article

Carbon export from mountain forests enhanced by earthquake-triggered landslides over millennia

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 772-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0216-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Durham University Seedcorn Grant, a Natural Environment Research Council Standard Grant [NE/P013538/1]
  2. Rutherford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship [RFTGNS1201-PD]
  3. COFUND Junior Research Fellowship at Durham University
  4. NERC [NE/P013538/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P013538/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid ground accelerations during earthquakes can trigger landslides that disturb mountain forests and harvest carbon from soils and vegetation. Although infrequent over human timescales, these co-seismic landslides can set the rates of geomorphic processes over centuries to millennia. However, the long-term impacts of earthquakes and landslides on carbon export from the biosphere remain poorly constrained. Here, we examine the sedimentary fill of Lake Paringa, New Zealand, which is fed by a river draining steep mountains proximal to the Alpine Fault. Carbon isotopes reveal enhanced accumulation rates of biospheric carbon after four large earthquakes over the past similar to 1,100 years, probably reflecting delivery of soil-derived carbon eroded by deep-seated landslides. Cumulatively these pulses of earthquake-mobilized carbon represent 23 +/- 5% of the record length, but account for 43 +/- 5% of the biospheric carbon in the core. Landslide simulations suggest that 14 +/- 5 million tonnes of carbon (MtC) could be eroded in each earthquake. Our findings support a link between active tectonics and the surface carbon cycle and suggest that large earthquakes can significantly contribute to carbon export from mountain forests over millennia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available