4.8 Article

Formation of the Grand Canyon 5 to 6 million years ago through integration of older palaeocanyons

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 239-244

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2065

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF from Tectonics Program [EAR-1242028]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1119629] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. Office of Integrative Activities [1301346] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The timing of formation of the Grand Canyon, USA, is vigorously debated. In one view, most of the canyon was carved by the Colorado River relatively recently, in the past 5-6 million years. Alternatively, the Grand Canyon could have been cut by precursor rivers in the same location and to within about 200 m of its modern depth as early as 70-55 million years ago. Here we investigate the time of formation of four out of five segments of the Grand Canyon, using apatite fission-track dating, track-length measurements and apatite helium dating: if any segment is young, the old canyon hypothesis is falsified. We reconstruct the thermal histories of samples taken from the modern canyon base and the adjacent canyon rim 1,500 m above, to constrain when the rocks cooled as a result of canyon incision. We find that two of the three middle segments, the Hurricane segment and the Eastern Grand Canyon, formed between 70 and 50 million years ago and between 25 and 15 million years ago, respectively. However, the two end segments, the Marble Canyon and the Westernmost Grand Canyon, are both young and were carved in the past 5-6 million years. Thus, although parts of the canyon are old, we conclude that the integration of the Colorado River through older palaeocanyons carved the Grand Canyon, beginning 5-6 million years ago.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available