4.8 Article

Glacial-interglacial changes in bottom-water oxygen content on the Portuguese margin

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 40-43

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2317

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/I020563/1]
  2. US National Science Foundation
  3. Natural Environment Research Council in the UK under management of the Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI)
  4. NERC [NE/I020563/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I020563/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the last and penultimate glacial maxima, atmospheric CO2 concentrations were lower than present, possibly in part because of increased storage of respired carbon in the deep oceans(1). The amount of respired carbon present in a water mass can be calculated from its oxygen content through apparent oxygen utilization; the oxygen content can in turn be calculated from the carbon isotope gradient within the sediment column(2). Here we analyse the shells of benthic foraminifera occurring at the sediment surface and the oxic/anoxic interface on the Portuguese Margin to reconstruct the carbon isotope gradient and hence bottom-water oxygenation over the past 150,000 years. We find that bottom-water oxygen concentrations were 45 and 65 mu mol kg(-1) lower than present during the last and penultimate glacial maxima, respectively. We calculate that concentrations of remineralized organic carbon were at least twice as high as today during the glacial maxima. We attribute these changes to decreased ventilation linked to a reorganization of ocean circulation(3) and a strengthened global biological pump(4). If the respired carbon pool was of a similar size throughout the entire glacial deep Atlantic basin, then this sink could account for 15 and 20 per cent of the glacial P-CO2 drawdown during the last and penultimate glacial maxima

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available