4.8 Article

Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 185-189

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2098

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. DOE/OBER Early Career Research Program Award [SCW1295]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite continued growth in atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases, global mean surface and tropospheric temperatures have shown slower warming since 1998 than previously(1-5). Possible explanations for the slow-down include internal climate variability(3,4,6,7), external cooling influences(1,2,4,8-11) and observational errors(12,13). Several recent modelling studies have examined the contribution of early twenty-first-century volcanic eruptions(1,2,4,8) to the muted surface warming. Here we present a detailed analysis of the impact of recent volcanic forcing on tropospheric temperature, based on observations as well as climate model simulations. We identify statistically significant correlations between observations of stratospheric aerosol optical depth and satellite-based estimates of both tropospheric temperature and short-wave fluxes at the top of the atmosphere. We show that climate model simulations without the effects of early twenty-first-century volcanic eruptions overestimate the tropospheric warming observed since 1998. In two simulations with more realistic volcanic influences following the 1991 Pinatubo eruption, differences between simulated and observed tropospheric temperature trends over the period 1998 to 2012 are up to 15% smaller, with large uncertainties in the magnitude of the effect. To reduce these uncertainties, better observations of eruption-specific properties of volcanic aerosols are needed, as well as improved representation of these eruption-specific properties in climate model simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available