4.8 Article

Mass wasting triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake is greater than orogenic growth

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 449-452

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1154

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/G002665/1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40841010]
  3. Willis Research Network
  4. BRGM Research Direction
  5. NERC [NE/G002665/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G002665/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shallow earthquakes are the primary driver of rock uplift in mountain ranges(1). However, large shallow earthquakes also trigger widespread, coseismic landslides that cause significant but spatially heterogeneous erosion(2-4). The interplay between rock uplift and the distribution and magnitudes of coseismic landslides thus raises a fundamental question as to whether large earthquakes and their associated landslides create or destroy mountainous topography. The 2008 M-w 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China triggered more than 56,000 landslides(5), with a spatial distribution that was only partly related to the pattern of tectonic deformation(6). Here we examine the potential changes in orogen volume using landslide area-volume scaling relationships(4,7) applied to high-resolution satellite imagery. We estimate that coseismic landsliding produced similar to 5-15 km(3) of erodible material, greater than the net volume of 2.6 +/- 1.2 km(3) added to the orogen by coseismic rock uplift(8). This discrepancy indicates that, even if only a fraction of the landslide debris is removed from the orogen over the likely similar to 2000-4000 yr earthquake return period(6), the Wenchuan earthquake will lead to a net material deficit in the Longmen Shan. Our result challenges the widely held notion that large dip-slip or oblique-slip earthquakes build mountainous topography, and invites more careful consideration of the relationships between coseismic slip, mass wasting and relief generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available