4.8 Article

Rapid formation of a modern bedrock canyon by a single flood event

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages 477-481

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO894

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Directorate For Geosciences
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences [0922199] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep river canyons are thought to form slowly over geological time (see, for example, ref. 1), cut by moderate flows that reoccur every few years(2,3). In contrast, some of the most spectacular canyons on Earth and Mars were probably carved rapidly during ancient megaflood events(4-12). Quantification of the flood discharge, duration and erosion mechanics that operated during such events is hampered because we lack modern analogues. Canyon Lake Gorge, Texas, was carved in 2002 during a single catastrophic flood(13). The event offers a rare opportunity to analyse canyon formation and test palaeohydraulic-reconstruction techniques under known topographic and hydraulic conditions. Here we use digital topographic models and visible/near-infrared aerial images from before and after the flood, discharge measured during the event, field measurements and sediment-transport modelling to show that the flood moved metre-sized boulders, excavated similar to 7 m of limestone and transformed a soil-mantled valley into a bedrock canyon in just similar to 3 days. We find that canyon morphology is strongly dependent on rock type: plucking of limestone blocks produced waterfalls, inner channels and bedrock strath terraces, whereas abrasion of cemented alluvium sculpted walls, plunge pools and streamlined islands. Canyon formation was so rapid that erosion might have been limited by the ability of the flow to transport sediment. We suggest that our results might improve hydraulic reconstructions of similar megafloods on Earth and Mars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available