4.8 Article

Complex rupture during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 800-805

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO977

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. NSF [1024990]
  4. UTIG [2285]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1024990] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Initially, the devastating M-w 7.0, 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake seemed to involve straightforward accommodation of oblique relative motion between the Caribbean and North American plates along the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone. Here, we combine seismological observations, geologic field data and space geodetic measurements to show that, instead, the rupture process involved slip on multiple faults. Primary surface deformation was driven by rupture on blind thrust faults with only minor, deep, lateral slip along or near the main Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone; thus the event only partially relieved centuries of accumulated left-lateral strain on a small part of the plate-boundary system. Together with the predominance of shallow off-fault thrusting, the lack of surface deformation implies that remaining shallow shear strain will be released in future surface-rupturing earthquakes on the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone, as occurred in inferred Holocene and probable historic events. We suggest that the geological signature of this earthquake-broad warping and coastal deformation rather than surface rupture along the main fault zone-will not be easily recognized by standard palaeoseismic studies. We conclude that similarly complex earthquakes in tectonic environments that accommodate both translation and convergence-such as the San Andreas fault through the Transverse Ranges of California-may be missing from the prehistoric earthquake record.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available