4.8 Article

Metabolic variability in seafloor brines revealed by carbon and sulphur dynamics

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 349-354

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation Life
  2. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration National Undersea Research Program
  3. Department of Energy
  4. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
  5. Environmental Protection Agency
  6. NASA Astrobiology Institute
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  8. Emerging Frontiers
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [0801973] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Emerging Frontiers
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [0969926, 0801741] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brine fluids that upwell from deep, hot reservoirs below the sea bed supply the sea floor with energy-rich substrates and nutrients that are used by diverse microbial ecosystems. Contemporary hypersaline environments formed by brine seeps may provide insights into the metabolism and distribution of microorganisms on the early Earth(1) or on extraterrestrial bodies(2). Here we use geochemical and genetic analyses to characterize microbial community composition and metabolism in two seafloor brines in the Gulf of Mexico: an active mud volcano and a quiescent brine pool. Both brine environments are anoxic and hypersaline. However, rates of sulphate reduction and acetate production are much higher in the brine pool, whereas the mud volcano supports much higher rates of methane production. We find no evidence of anaerobic oxidation of methane, despite high methane fluxes at both sites. We conclude that the contrasting microbial community compositions and metabolisms are linked to differences in dissolved-organic-matter input from the deep subsurface and different fluid advection rates between the two sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available