4.8 Article

Dynamic 3D chromatin architecture contributes to enhancer specificity and limb morphogenesis

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 50, Issue 10, Pages 1463-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0221-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SP1532/2-1, MU 880/14]
  2. Max Planck Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [P300PA_160964, P2ELP3_151960]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1U54DK107977-01]
  5. CINECA ISCRA [HP10CRTY8P]
  6. Einstein BIH Fellowship Award [EVF-BIH-2016-282]
  7. NIH [R01HG003988, U54HG006997, R24HL123879, UM1HL098166]
  8. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300PA_160964, P2ELP3_151960] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regulatory specificity of enhancers and their interaction with gene promoters is thought to be controlled by their sequence and the binding of transcription factors. By studying Pitx1, a regulator of hindlimb development, we show that dynamic changes in chromatin conformation can restrict the activity of enhancers. Inconsistent with its hindlimb-restricted expression, Pitx1 is controlled by an enhancer (Pen) that shows activity in forelimbs and hindlimbs. By Capture Hi-C and three-dimensional modeling of the locus, we demonstrate that forelimbs and hindlimbs have fundamentally different chromatin configurations, whereby Pen and Pitx1 interact in hindlimbs and are physically separated in forelimbs. Structural variants can convert the inactive into the active conformation, thereby inducing Pitx1 misexpression in forelimbs, causing partial arm-to-leg transformation in mice and humans. Thus, tissue-specific three-dimensional chromatin conformation can contribute to enhancer activity and specificity in vivo and its disturbance can result in gene misexpression and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available