4.8 Article

Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 50, Issue 9, Pages 1219-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award from Harvard Catalyst - National Institutes of Health [TR001100]
  2. National Lipid Association
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health [T32 HL007208, K23HL114724, R01HL139731, RO1HL092577, R01HL128914, K24HL105780, RO1 HL127564]
  4. National Human Genome Research Institute of the US National Institutes of Health [5UM1HG008895]
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [2014105]
  6. Foundation Leducq [14CVD01]
  7. Ofer and Shelly Nemirovsky Research Scholar Award from Massachusetts General Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key public health need is to identify individuals at high risk for a given disease to enable enhanced screening or preventive therapies. Because most common diseases have a genetic component, one important approach is to stratify individuals based on inherited DNA variation(1). Proposed clinical applications have largely focused on finding carriers of rare monogenic mutations at several-fold increased risk. Although most disease risk is polygenic in nature(2-5), it has not yet been possible to use polygenic predictors to identify individuals at risk comparable to monogenic mutations. Here, we develop and validate genome-wide polygenic scores for five common diseases. The approach identifies 8.0, 6.1, 3.5, 3.2, and 1.5% of the population at greater than threefold increased risk for coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast cancer, respectively. For coronary artery disease, this prevalence is 20-fold higher than the carrier frequency of rare monogenic mutations conferring comparable risk(6). We propose that it is time to contemplate the inclusion of polygenic risk prediction in clinical care, and discuss relevant issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available