4.8 Article

Evolution and transmission of drug-resistant tuberculosis in a Russian population

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 279-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2878

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union Framework Programme 7 (TB-EUROGEN) [201483]
  2. Wellcome Trust [098051]
  3. EUROGEN
  4. Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow in Basic Biomedical Science [095198/Z/10/Z]
  5. European Research Council Starting Grant [260477]
  6. Medical Research Council [974668] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Wellcome Trust [095198/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [260477] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The molecular mechanisms determining the transmissibility and prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in a population were investigated through whole-genome sequencing of 1,000 prospectively obtained patient isolates from Russia. Two-thirds belonged to the Beijing lineage, which was dominated by two homogeneous clades. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) genotypes were found in 48% of isolates overall and in 87% of the major clades. The most common rpoB mutation was associated with fitness-compensatory mutations in rpoA or rpoC, and a new intragenic compensatory substitution was identified. The proportion of MDR cases with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis was 16% overall, with 65% of MDR isolates harboring eis mutations, selected by kanamycin therapy, which may drive the expansion of strains with enhanced virulence. The combination of drug resistance and compensatory mutations displayed by the major clades confers clinical resistance without compromising fitness and transmissibility, showing that, in addition to weaknesses in the tuberculosis control program, biological factors drive the persistence and spread of MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Russia and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available