4.8 Article

7q11.23 dosage-dependent dysregulation in human pluripotent stem cells affects transcriptional programs in disease-relevant lineages

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 132-141

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3169

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Telethon Network of Genetic Biobanks [GTB12001G, GTB12001A]
  2. European Research Council [616441-DISEASEAVATARS]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health
  4. EPIGEN Flagship Project of the Italian National Research Council
  5. Jerome-Lejeune Foundation
  6. ERA-NET Neuron Program
  7. Umberto Veronesi Foundation
  8. Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS)
  9. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell reprogramming promises to make characterization of the impact of human genetic variation on health and disease experimentally tractable by enabling the bridging of genotypes to phenotypes in developmentally relevant human cell lineages. Here we apply this paradigm to two disorders caused by symmetrical copy number variations of 7q11.23, which display a striking combination of shared and symmetrically opposite phenotypes-Williams-Beuren syndrome and 7q-microduplication syndrome. Through analysis of transgene-free patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated derivatives, we find that 7q11.23 dosage imbalance disrupts transcriptional circuits in disease-relevant pathways beginning in the pluripotent state. These alterations are then selectively amplified upon differentiation of the pluripotent cells into disease-relevant lineages. A considerable proportion of this transcriptional dysregulation is specifically caused by dosage imbalances in GTF2I, which encodes a key transcription factor at 7q11.23 that is associated with the LSD1 repressive chromatin complex and silences its dosage-sensitive targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available