4.8 Article

Genome-wide association study of multiple congenital heart disease phenotypes identifies a susceptibility locus for atrial septal defect at chromosome 4p16

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 822-U151

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2637

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [BH100708, 087436, 090532/Z/09/Z, 085475]
  2. British Heart Foundation (BHF)
  3. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2008-223040]
  4. SickKids Labatt Family Heart Centre Biobank
  5. Netherlands Heart Foundation [NHS2010B175]
  6. Heart Research UK
  7. US National Institutes of Health [HL068880]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Labex project Medical Genomics
  9. BHF Centre of Research Excellence in Oxford
  10. European Community
  11. UK Department of Health via a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  12. British Heart Foundation [RG/10/17/28553, PG/07/045/22690, RG/07/010/23676, FS/12/55/29695, RG/13/10/30376] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of congenital heart disease (CHD). Our discovery cohort comprised 1,995 CHD cases and 5,159 controls and included affected individuals from each of the 3 major clinical CHD categories (with septal, obstructive and cyanotic defects). When all CHD phenotypes were considered together, no region achieved genome-wide significant association. However, a region on chromosome 4p16, adjacent to the MSX1 and STX18 genes, was associated (P = 9.5 x 10(-7)) with the risk of ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) in the discovery cohort (N = 340 cases), and this association was replicated in a further 417 ASD cases and 2,520 controls (replication P = 5.0 x 10(-5); odds ratio (OR) in replication cohort = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-1.65; combined P = 2.6 x 10(-10)). Genotype accounted for similar to 9% of the population-attributable risk of ASD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available