4.8 Article

Mutations causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1 lie in a large VNTR in MUC1 missed by massively parallel sequencing

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 299-303

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2543

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Carlos Slim Health Institute
  2. Intramural Research Program of the US NIH, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
  3. Charles University [PRVOUK-P24/LF1/3, UNCE 204011]
  4. Ministry of Education [LH12015, NT13116-4/2012]
  5. US NIH grant [DK34854]
  6. Human Frontier Science Program, Alon
  7. Israeli Centers of Research Excellence (I-CORE)
  8. Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics at Tel Aviv University
  9. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although genetic lesions responsible for some mendelian disorders can be rapidly discovered through massively parallel sequencing of whole genomes or exomes, not all diseases readily yield to such efforts. We describe the illustrative case of the simple mendelian disorder medullary cystic kidney disease type 1 (MCKD1), mapped more than a decade ago to a 2-Mb region on chromosome 1. Ultimately, only by cloning, capillary sequencing and de novo assembly did we find that each of six families with MCKD1 harbors an equivalent but apparently independently arising mutation in sequence markedly under-represented in massively parallel sequencing data: the insertion of a single cytosine in one copy (but a different copy in each family) of the repeat unit comprising the extremely long (similar to 1.5-5 kb), GC-rich (>80%) coding variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) sequence in the MUC1 gene encoding mucin 1. These results provide a cautionary tale about the challenges in identifying the genes responsible for mendelian, let alone more complex, disorders through massively parallel sequencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available