4.8 Article

Mutations in genes encoding the cadherin receptor-ligand pair DCHS1 and FAT4 disrupt cerebral cortical development

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1300-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2765

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cure Kids New Zealand
  2. Health Research Council of New Zealand [10/402]
  3. Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award
  4. King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 817]
  6. joint Medical Research Council [G0700089]
  7. Wellcome Trust [GR082557]
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_15004, G0700089] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [G0700089, MC_PC_15004] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regulated proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells before the generation and migration of neurons in the cerebral cortex are central aspects of mammalian development. Periventricular neuronal heterotopia, a specific form of mislocalization of cortical neurons, can arise from neuronal progenitors that fail to negotiate aspects of these developmental processes. Here we show that mutations in genes encoding the receptor-ligand cadherin pair DCHS1 and FAT4 lead to a recessive syndrome in humans that includes periventricular neuronal heterotopia. Reducing the expression of Dchs1 or Fat4 within mouse embryonic neuroepithelium increased progenitor cell numbers and reduced their differentiation into neurons, resulting in the heterotopic accumulation of cells below the neuronal layers in the neocortex, reminiscent of the human phenotype. These effects were countered by concurrent knockdown of Yap, a transcriptional effector of the Hippo signaling pathway. These findings implicate Dchs1 and Fat4 upstream of Yap as key regulators of mammalian neurogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available