4.8 Article

The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 279-284

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2529

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [CA98543, CA98413, RC1MD004418, CA124709, CA060104]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute grant [U54HG003067]
  3. National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship
  5. Roman M. Babicki Fellowship in Medical Research at the University of British Columbia
  6. Canada Research Chair in Genome Science
  7. Giulio D'Angio Endowed Chair
  8. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  9. Arms Wide Open Foundation
  10. Cookies for Kids Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroblastoma is a malignancy of the developing sympathetic nervous system that often presents with widespread metastatic disease, resulting in survival rates of less than 50%. To determine the spectrum of somatic mutation in high-risk neuroblastoma, we studied 240 affected individuals (cases) using a combination of whole-exome, genome and transcriptome sequencing as part of the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) initiative. Here we report a low median exonic mutation frequency of 0.60 per Mb (0.48 nonsilent) and notably few recurrently mutated genes in these tumors. Genes with significant somatic mutation frequencies included ALK (9.2% of cases), PTPN11 (2.9%), ATRX (2.5%, and an additional 7.1% had focal deletions), MYCN (1.7%, causing a recurrent p.Pro44Leu alteration) and NRAS (0.83%). Rare, potentially pathogenic germline variants were significantly enriched in ALK, CHEK2, PINK1 and BARD1. The relative paucity of recurrent somatic mutations in neuroblastoma challenges current therapeutic strategies that rely on frequently altered oncogenic drivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available