4.8 Article

The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 487-494

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2586

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali-Italy (MiPAAF) [DM14999/7303/08]
  3. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) through USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) [2010-2010-03255]
  4. Robert and Louis Coker Chair for Plant Molecular Genetics
  5. Chilean government [FDI G02P1001]
  6. Basal ProgramPB-16
  7. FONDAP [CRG15090007]
  8. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CSD2007-00036]
  9. French National Research Agency (ANR) through Chex-ABRIWG ANR/INRA [22000552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rosaceae is the most important fruit-producing clade, and its key commercially relevant genera (Fragaria, Rosa, Rubus and Prunus) show broadly diverse growth habits, fruit types and compact diploid genomes. Peach, a diploid Prunus species, is one of the best genetically characterized deciduous trees. Here we describe the high-quality genome sequence of peach obtained from a completely homozygous genotype. We obtained a complete chromosome-scale assembly using Sanger whole-genome shotgun methods. We predicted 27,852 protein-coding genes, as well as noncoding RNAs. We investigated the path of peach domestication through whole-genome resequencing of 14 Prunus accessions. The analyses suggest major genetic bottlenecks that have substantially shaped peach genome diversity. Furthermore, comparative analyses showed that peach has not undergone recent whole-genome duplication, and even though the ancestral triplicated blocks in peach are fragmentary compared to those in grape, all seven paleosets of paralogs from the putative paleoancestor are detectable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available