4.8 Article

Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 1104-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2396

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF) as part of the NGFNplus program [01GS08100, 01GS08101]
  2. Max Planck Society [M.I..F.A.NEUR8061]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB832, TP6, TP5, Z1, TH1386/3-1]
  4. European Union's Framework Programme CURELUNG [HEALTH-F2-2010-258677]
  5. Stand Up To Cancer-American Association for Cancer Research Innovative Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-IR60109]
  6. Behrens-Weise Foundation
  7. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Center [P30 CA021765]
  8. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
  9. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [IG 9425]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive lung tumor subtype with poor prognosis(1-3). We sequenced 29 SCLC exomes, 2 genomes and 15 transcriptomes and found an extremely high mutation rate of 7.4 +/- 1 protein-changing mutations per million base pairs. Therefore, we conducted integrated analyses of the various data sets to identify pathogenetically relevant mutated genes. In all cases, we found evidence for inactivation of TP53 and RB1 and identified recurrent mutations in the CREBBP, EP300 and MLL genes that encode histone modifiers. Furthermore, we observed mutations in PTEN, SLIT2 and EPHA7, as well as focal amplifications of the FGFR1 tyrosine kinase gene. Finally, we detected many of the alterations found in humans in SCLC tumors from Tp53 and Rb1 double knockout mice(4). Our study implicates histone modification as a major feature of SCLC, reveals potentially therapeutically tractable genomic alterations and provides a generalizable framework for the identification of biologically relevant genes in the context of high mutational background.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available