4.8 Article

Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 720-U154

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2281

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-03587]
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-0820610, DBI-0820619, DBI-1027527]
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0002259]
  4. USDA-ARS
  5. Kansas State University
  6. Kansas State University Center for Sorghum Improvement
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1027527, 0820610, 820831] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [0820619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key step during crop domestication is the loss of seed shattering. Here, we show that seed shattering in sorghum is controlled by a single gene, Shattering1 (Sh1), which encodes a YABBY transcription factor. Domesticated sorghums harbor three different mutations at the Sh1 locus. Variants at regulatory sites in the promoter and intronic regions lead to a low level of expression, a 2.2-kb deletion causes a truncated transcript that lacks exons 2 and 3, and a GT-to-GG splice-site variant in the intron 4 results in removal of the exon 4. The distributions of these non-shattering haplotypes among sorghum landraces suggest three independent origins. The function of the rice ortholog (OsSh1) was subsequently validated with a shattering-resistant mutant, and two maize orthologs (ZmSh1-1 and ZmSh1-5.1+ZmSh1-5.2) were verified with a large mapping population. Our results indicate that Sh1 genes for seed shattering were under parallel selection during sorghum, rice and maize domestication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available