4.8 Article

FAN1 mutations cause karyomegalic interstitial nephritis, linking chronic kidney failure to defective DNA damage repair

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 44, Issue 8, Pages 910-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2347

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [DK068306, DK090917, DK091405]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award for Medical Scientists
  3. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Development Awards
  4. European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7 [241955]
  5. SYSCILIA
  6. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  7. NWO [Vidi-917.66.354]
  8. US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK020572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a major health burden(1). Its central feature of renal fibrosis is not well understood. By exome sequencing, we identified mutations in FAN1 as a cause of karyomegalic interstitial nephritis (KIN), a disorder that serves as a model for renal fibrosis. Renal histology in KIN is indistinguishable from that of nephronophthisis, except for the presence of karyomegaly(2). The FAN1 protein has nuclease activity and acts in DNA interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair within the Fanconi anemia DNA damage response (DDR) pathway(3-6). We show that cells from individuals with FAN1 mutations have sensitivity to the ICL-inducing agent mitomycin C but do not exhibit chromosome breakage or cell cycle arrest after diepoxybutane treatment, unlike cells from individuals with Fanconi anemia. We complemented ICL sensitivity with wild-type FAN1 but not with cDNA having mutations found in individuals with KIN. Depletion of fan1 in zebrafish caused increased DDR, apoptosis and kidney cysts. Our findings implicate susceptibility to environmental genotoxins and inadequate DNA repair as novel mechanisms contributing to renal fibrosis and CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available