4.8 Article

Association analyses identify six new psoriasis susceptibility loci in the Chinese population

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 1005-U132

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.690

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2007AA02Z161]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [30530670, 30771196, 30771942, 30800990, 81072461, 81071285, 30972727, 30800610, 81000691]
  3. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AR050266, R01AR42742, R01AR054966, R01AR050511]
  4. German Ministry of Education
  5. National Genome Research Network [BMFT 01GS 0171, BMBF NUW-S23T10]
  6. National Psoriasis Foundation of the US
  7. Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We extended our previous genome-wide association study for psoriasis with a multistage replication study including 8,312 individuals with psoriasis (cases) and 12,919 controls from China as well as 3,293 cases and 4,188 controls from Germany and the United States and 254 nuclear families from the United States. We identified six new susceptibility loci associated with psoriasis in the Chinese study containing the candidate genes ERAP1, PTTG1, CSMD1, GJB2, SERPINB8 and ZNF816A (combined P < 5 x 10(-8)) and replicated one locus, 5q33.1 (TNIP1-ANXA6), previously reported (combined P = 3.8 x 10(-21)) in the European studies. Two of these loci showed evidence for association in the German study at ZNF816A and GJB2 with P = 3.6 x 10(-3) and P = 7.9 x 10(-3), respectively. ERAP1 and ZNF816A were associated with type 1 (early onset) psoriasis in the Chinese Han population (test for heterogeneity P = 6.5 x 10(-3) and P = 1.5 x 10(-3), respectively). Comparisons with the results of previous GWAS of psoriasis highlight the heterogeneity of disease susceptibility between the Chinese and European populations. Our study identifies new genetic susceptibility factors and suggests new biological pathways in psoriasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available